I use GRY Pedestrian Plazas all the time. They are great for connecting pedmalls to roads and allowing pedestrian traffic to bypass the road system to get to transit, jobs etc. There are a couple of other lots that do the same thing, but I wonder why it is that other parks, in fact all parks, are not transit enabled in this way. Is it a technical issue, or could, for example, BSC Parks be likewise transit enabled.
Another question: Are there additional pedmall textures that can be added to the NAM?
Thanks.
It's a technical issue because they can't be chained together.
That makes sense. However you can chain Pedestrian Plazas if you insert pedmalls between them. Could pedmall spacers be designed match BSC Parks (for instance)?
It seems to me that transit-enabled park tiles can be chained together if you space them with matching ped-mall tiles.
(https://www.sc4devotion.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davemckay.ca%2F_Temp%2FPedestrian_02.jpg&hash=17dc15c7dfc8ee2a4962ea07d79e521d69525eb0)
Is it possible to make NAM pedestrian mall tiles to match the BSC Parks?
No interest?
Quote from: dahemac on May 18, 2010, 06:51:17 AMIs it possible to make NAM pedestrian mall tiles to match the BSC Parks?
Why not? Ask it to their creators :)
This idea is very practical, especially in large cities. Here are some example of my parks, using N.A.M. and Pegasus stuff
(https://www.sc4devotion.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg199.imageshack.us%2Fimg199%2F7725%2Fpedpark1.jpg&hash=fdba8314834297d8567fdb5e76f6901168207f7a)
(https://www.sc4devotion.com/forums/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg42.imageshack.us%2Fimg42%2F4994%2Fpedpark2.jpg&hash=83158fa269c6bd640c972c9f5154e9b8645b7708)