• Welcome to SC4 Devotion Forum Archives.
 

News:

The SC4 Devotion Forums are no longer active, but remain online in an archived, read-only "museum" state.  It is not possible for regular members to post or use the private messaging system, and no technical support will be provided for any issues pertaining to the forums in their current state.  Attachments (those that still work) are accessible without login.

The LEX has been replaced with SC4Evermore (SC4E), and SC4E maintains an active Discord server.  For traditional forums, we recommend Simtropolis.

Main Menu

understanding power plant aging

Started by eastwind, December 22, 2007, 03:45:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

eastwind

I'm trying to understand the properties that control power plant aging. The minimum age of an unmodified coal plant is supposed to be 38 years (I think this comes from the official guide). But looking at the properties in the SC4tool building reference what I see is a bunch of numbers (16 of them) for "age to maintenance cost multiplier response curve", another similar bunch for "age to output level response curve", a single age degradation rate number (0.001111) and a soft failure threshold (0.898).

Can anyone explain how to interpret these numbers?

RippleJet

Let's take the values for the coal plant as an example:


The Age degradation rate is 0.001111

This tells you the degradation per month. This number is added every month to the accumulated degradation.
Once the degradation reaches the value given in Soft Failure Threshold (=0.9), the plant will show visual distress and have frequent outages.

Once the degradation reaches the value given in Hard Failure Threshold (=1.0), the plant stops working or blows up (as given in the property Hard Failure Type).
In other words, after 1/0.001111 months = 900 months = 75 years you won't get any power at all from a coal plant.


The Age to output level response curve consists of 8 paired values, relative age and relative output level:


Relative Age 0.0   Real Age
0.0 years   
Output level
100%
Relative Age 0.4Real Age
30.0 years   
Output level
95%
Relative Age 0.5Real Age
37.5 years   
Output level
92%
Relative Age 0.6Real Age
45.0 years   
Output level
86%
Relative Age 0.7Real Age
52.5 years   
Output level
77%
Relative Age 0.8Real Age
60.0 years   
Output level
60%
Relative Age 0.9Real Age
67.5 years   
Output level
35%
Relative Age 1.0Real Age
75.0 years   
Output level
0%


The Age to maintenance cost multiplier response curve consists of similarly 8 paired values, relative age and relative cost:


Relative Age 0.0   Real Age
0.0 years   
Monthly Cost
100%
Relative Age 0.4Real Age
30.0 years   
Monthly Cost
103%
Relative Age 0.5Real Age
37.5 years   
Monthly Cost
105%
Relative Age 0.6Real Age
45.0 years   
Monthly Cost
115%
Relative Age 0.7Real Age
52.5 years   
Monthly Cost
130%
Relative Age 0.8Real Age
60.0 years   
Monthly Cost
155%
Relative Age 0.9Real Age
67.5 years   
Monthly Cost
185%
Relative Age 1.0Real Age
75.0 years   
Monthly Cost
300%


Between the given threshold values, the output level and cost multiplier are linearly interpolated.

eastwind

Thanks, that's clear (at least to me)! :thumbsup:

I guess usage level during the month must modify the age degradation before it's added to the accumulated degradation -- or else the stuff about power plants aging faster if they're run harder is wrong? To get the 38 year minimum lifespan for a coal plant would require doubling the degradation. I don't know where I got this 38 number from, its in a spreadsheet I have from when I played the game a couple years ago that tries to calculate the lifetime average cost per MWh taking all costs into account. But my spreadsheet is clearly too simplistic.


RippleJet

There are two properties in the Utilities Simulator exemplar that set these:


The Funding percentage to decay rate multiplier response curve gives a slight variation on the rate of degradation:


Funding Level 
0 %   
Degradation Rate 
110 %
Funding Level
100 %   
Degradation Rate
100 %
Funding Level
120 %   
Degradation Rate
90 %


The Usage percentage to decay rate multiplier response curve gives a larger variation on the rate of degradation:


Capacity Used 
0 %   
Degradation Rate 
10 %
Capacity Used
25 %   
Degradation Rate
20 %
Capacity Used
50 %   
Degradation Rate
45 %
Capacity Used
75 %   
Degradation Rate
85 %
Capacity Used
90 %   
Degradation Rate
125 %
Capacity Used
100 %   
Degradation Rate
155 %
Capacity Used
110 %   
Degradation Rate
200 %


A lifespan of 38 years would be a result of using the plant at 110% capacity.