• Welcome to SC4 Devotion Forum Archives.
 

News:

The SC4 Devotion Forums are no longer active, but remain online in an archived, read-only "museum" state.  It is not possible for regular members to post or use the private messaging system, and no technical support will be provided for any issues pertaining to the forums in their current state.  Attachments (those that still work) are accessible without login.

The LEX has been replaced with SC4Evermore (SC4E), and SC4E maintains an active Discord server.  For traditional forums, we recommend Simtropolis.

Main Menu

Swesim´s attempts at Lotting

Started by Swesim, January 17, 2008, 01:36:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FrankU

Swesim,

That is a nice addition to the game.
I have just one question: would it be possible to make a pathway go under the elevated network?
This would of course mean an offset prop with pathway, but maybe someone would be so kind to make one?

Edit: sorry typo...

BarbyW

Quote from: Swesim on June 15, 2009, 04:25:34 AM
OK, that´s more or less what I thought, but I was somewhat doubtful after reading Your posts in the CAN-AM project. ;)

The problem with the CAN-AM is that to make it work correctly the model file for the water has to be included in the mod. This is possible where permission is given - ie for SG and CAL canals - but not where an EULA prohibits it.
Inside every old person is a young person wondering what happened. TP



Barbypedia: More alive than the original

Swesim

Quote from: FrankU on June 15, 2009, 04:43:21 AM
Swesim,

That is a nice addition to the game.
I have just one question: would it be possible to make a pathway go under the elevated network?
This would of course mean an offset prop with pathway, but maybe someone would be so kind to make one?

Edit: sorry typo...

I´m not sure what You´re after, but if You are looking for a straight path to go under el-network tiles I believe that exists already:

Try this...

Quote from: BarbyW on June 15, 2009, 06:18:42 AM
The problem with the CAN-AM is that to make it work correctly the model file for the water has to be included in the mod. This is possible where permission is given - ie for SG and CAL canals - but not where an EULA prohibits it.
Thanks for the explanation!

FrankU

Yup,

Indeed I overlooked this lot in the BSC parks completely.
Thanks.